“The best ability is availability.”
It is one of those phrases that gets repeated across team sports because, at its core, it is true. You cannot contribute if you are not available. It does not matter how strong, skilled, fast, or talented an athlete is if they cannot get on the court. From that perspective, availability is foundational.
This becomes especially apparent after injury. Much of the rehabilitation process is necessarily focused on restoring availability. We rebuild physical qualities, reintroduce sport demands, progress participation, and eventually reach the point where the athlete is cleared to compete again.
The problem is that the moment the athlete becomes available, availability is no longer enough.
Available again
Imagine a basketball player returning after a significant injury. They have spent months working through rehabilitation. Strength has returned. They have progressed through running, jumping, change of direction, basketball activity, practice, and eventually full participation. The boxes have been checked and they are cleared.
Their name gets called and, for the first time in months, they check back into a game.
Maybe they are late on a defensive rotation. They struggle to stay in front of the ball. They cannot create the same separation they used to. Their timing around the rim is slightly off. A shot they normally make doesn't fall. A few possessions later, they are back on the bench.
They did not suddenly become injured again. Nothing changed about their medical clearance. They are still available. What changed was the question being asked of them.
For months, the question was whether they could get back onto the court. Now the question is whether they can perform once they are there.
That is the transition from return to play to return to performance.
Availability creates opportunity
This distinction becomes even more important when an athlete has already demonstrated a certain level of performance before the injury. Prior performance provides evidence of what they are capable of when healthy.
If a player was starting, playing meaningful minutes, and producing before the injury, then a rough first game or even a few rough games does not suddenly redefine what they are capable of. There is already evidence of the level they can reach. The people around them have seen them perform at that level before.
Compare that with a player who has not yet established themselves. Maybe they were fighting for minutes before the injury. Maybe their role was still developing. Maybe they had only begun to demonstrate what they could contribute before losing the opportunity to do so.
Their availability matters just as much, but the context surrounding their performance after returning is different. There is less established evidence of what their performance might become, which makes those early opportunities particularly valuable.
Vaudreuil and colleagues provide an interesting example of this in NBA players following ACL reconstruction. They found that post-ACLR outcomes differed according to preinjury player status, including All-Star status and salary. Players with greater established success before injury could experience declines in performance after returning while still continuing their careers, while players with less established status experienced different return and career outcomes.
The study cannot tell us why an individual athlete received minutes or opportunities after returning, but it does illustrate an important point. Performance before injury changes the context surrounding performance after injury.
If an athlete has already demonstrated a high level of performance, there is evidence of what they might return to. For an athlete who has not established that same track record, there is more uncertainty. That makes those early opportunities matter.
Preparing for more than just availability
This is why return to performance has to be part of the preparation process, not something we simply hope happens after clearance.
Suiting up doesn’t make you super.
We need to restore strength, power, movement capacity, conditioning, and the physical qualities required to tolerate the demands of the sport. Those qualities help make the athlete available and support their ability to remain available. But availability is the foundation, not the final product.
At some point, the rehabilitation question has to progress from
Can this athlete tolerate sport safely?
to
Can this athlete perform the tasks their role requires?
A player can be physically capable of participating in practice without being prepared to defend the point of attack. They can tolerate running up and down the floor without being able to repeatedly create separation late in a possession. They can demonstrate excellent strength and power in testing without being able to express those qualities effectively within the timing, spacing, decision-making, and demands of their role.
This is where the context of performance becomes important.
One athlete's 75% may still be more productive than another athlete's 100%. An athlete can also return to 100% of their previous physical testing and still not be performing at the level required to contribute within their current environment.
That does not diminish the importance of physical testing. It changes what we expect those measures to tell us. They help us understand whether the athlete possesses the physical qualities needed to perform. They do not, by themselves, tell us whether the athlete will perform.
Performance follows opportunity
Returning from injury involves more than earning the opportunity to step back onto the court. The preparation process should give the athlete opportunities to demonstrate that they can execute their role before those repetitions begin to carry the consequences of actual competition.
For an athlete with an established history of high-level performance, there is already evidence of what they are capable of becoming again. For an athlete without that history, the opportunities to establish it may be fewer, making preparation for those opportunities even more important.
The goal of rehabilitation cannot stop at making the athlete available. We have to prepare them to perform when that availability creates an opportunity.
Availability gets you back on the court. Performance determines what you do once you're there and whether you get to stay.
The best ability is availability until you have to perform.
TOMMY OTLEYPhysical therapist, sport scientist, educator, and researcher working at the intersection of rehabilitation and performance.
READ MORE
Returning to competition is an important milestone, but it does not mean performance has been restored. This edition of The Film Room explores the gap between return and performance, why performance requires an outcome, and how role, opportunity, and context complicate what “back” really means. If we say an athlete has returned to performance, we have to be able to show it.